The discussion also raised questions about the forms through which queer histories are preserved. Speaking about Dyke 4 Dyke, Pearn-Lewis and Woodmansey described the continued importance of physical publishing in an increasingly digital world. While social media provides unprecedented opportunities for connection, they argued that printed matter offers a different kind of permanence – one less vulnerable to changing algorithms, platform moderation and corporate control. In turn, it can be argued that the cemented nature of printed material further solidifies periods of community, allowing a traceable nature of its evolution compared to the ever-changing landscapes of the digital realms.
This highlights a tension that feels central to contemporary queer culture. Visibility can create opportunities for recognition and solidarity, but it can also expose communities to scrutiny. As digital platforms become increasingly monitored, physical archives, books and zines continue to serve as vital repositories of queer memory.